المستخلص: |
In the closed job system, which consider a career the function is career The employee is assigned to her his life. The importance of the promotion as an aspiration for the employee up to be seen as his right on the administration. If it is unreasonable in the employee’s logic to join a rank that is relevant to him throughout his life, The general employee should also be held in a single job rank with the public interest required by the rehabilitation of the employees to join higher positions. Therefore, the proper legal logic is necessary to find the rules of the system that preserve the employee’s opportunity to promotion and the right of the public administration to achieve the public interest. This research discusses this subject in the Saudi system, a comparative study with the Egyptian system through introduction and two studies, which examined the nature of the promotion and its provisions and judicial control over them. The research concluded several results and then many proposals. The most important results were some problems In the list of promotions, and also instability in the judicial characterization of the promotion and then conflicting judicial rulings onjhe subject of promotion, which led to the formulation of several proposals, the details of which call to amend the list of promotions, as detailed in the research and in its conclusion, We call on the judiciary to look at the legal adaptation of the decision promotion through the rules of the system, which is followed by the correct adjustment, and therefore in the light of the promotions list, promotion can not be considered a right of the administration towards the employee even if the statutory conditions for promotion are completed, The administration’s abstention from issuing a decision is not considered a negative decision, and therefore it is not subject to its provisions. All of this was detailed in the research and in its final conclusion, in which the legal provisions for promotion and judicial supervision were discussed.
|