ارسل ملاحظاتك

ارسل ملاحظاتك لنا







الرئيسية > A Pragma-Rhetorical Study of A...>الوصف
يجب تسجيل الدخول أولا

A Pragma-Rhetorical Study of Argument in Islamic-Christian Debates

المصدر: مجلة آداب الفراهيدي
الناشر: جامعة تكريت - كلية الآداب
المؤلف الرئيسي: Yahaya, Zaid Samir (Author)
مؤلفين آخرين: Ali, Abd Hmood (Co-Author)
المجلد/العدد: مج14, ع48
محكمة: نعم
الدولة: العراق
التاريخ الميلادي: 2022
الشهر: يناير
الصفحات: 615 - 642
DOI: 10.51990/2228-014-048-082
ISSN: 2074-9554
رقم MD: 1217685
نوع المحتوى: بحوث ومقالات
اللغة: الإنجليزية
قواعد المعلومات: AraBase
مواضيع:
المناظرات الدينية | العقيدة الإسلامية | النصارى
كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية:
Pragma-Rhetorical | Rhetoric | Persuasion | Argumentation | Politeness Strategies | Islamic-Christian Debates
رابط المحتوى:

الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها.
صورة الغلاف QR قانون
حفظ في:
المستخلص: A debate is a special form of an argumentative dialogue in which two or more parties take part in attacking and defending certain claims through reasoned discourse. This study has set itself to pragmatically analyze and evaluate selected arguments of religious debates. Islamic Christian debates are specifically chosen as data for the current study because they have not received due attention in language studies. This study is essentially concerned with investigating the pragma-rhetorical strategies utilized in the context of Deedat-Swaggart’s debate. To fulfill the aims, it is hypothesized that debaters utilize certain rhetorical pragmatics strategies: figures of speech (metaphor, allusion, irony, rhetorical question, and hyperbole), argumentation appeals (logos, pathos, ethos), and politeness strategies; and highlighting the rules that have to be fulfilled to produce a successful speech act of persuasion. The study employs a mixed method (qualitative and quantitative) to analyze the data and to verify or reject the hypotheses. The results of the study reveal that the most frequent pragmatic strategies utilized by debate are: rhetorical questions, logos, and off record politeness strategies, whereas Swaggart highly employs: metaphor, ethos, and off record politeness strategies. The results have also shown that Deedat’s arguments are stronger and more persuasive than Swaggart’s in terms of satisfying the rules of the successful speech act of persuasion.
ISSN: 2074-9554

عناصر مشابهة


© 2024 المنظومة. جميع الحقوق محفوظة.