A Pragma-Rhetorical Study of Argument in Islamic-Christian Debates
| المصدر: | مجلة آداب الفراهيدي |
|---|---|
| الناشر: | جامعة تكريت - كلية الآداب |
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | Yahaya, Zaid Samir (Author) |
| مؤلفين آخرين: | Ali, Abd Hmood (Co-Author) |
| المجلد/العدد: | مج14, ع48 |
| محكمة: | نعم |
| الدولة: |
العراق |
| التاريخ الميلادي: |
2022
|
| الشهر: | يناير |
| الصفحات: | 615 - 642 |
| DOI: |
10.51990/2228-014-048-082 |
| ISSN: |
2074-9554 |
| رقم MD: | 1217685 |
| نوع المحتوى: | بحوث ومقالات |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| قواعد المعلومات: | AraBase |
| مواضيع: | |
| كلمات المؤلف المفتاحية: |
Pragma-Rhetorical | Rhetoric | Persuasion | Argumentation | Politeness Strategies | Islamic-Christian Debates
|
| رابط المحتوى: |
الناشر لهذه المادة لم يسمح بإتاحتها. |
| LEADER | 02510nam a22002417a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1964959 | ||
| 024 | |3 10.51990/2228-014-048-082 | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 044 | |b العراق | ||
| 100 | |9 650852 |a Yahaya, Zaid Samir |e Author | ||
| 245 | |a A Pragma-Rhetorical Study of Argument in Islamic-Christian Debates | ||
| 260 | |b جامعة تكريت - كلية الآداب |c 2022 |g يناير | ||
| 300 | |a 615 - 642 | ||
| 336 | |a بحوث ومقالات |b Article | ||
| 520 | |b A debate is a special form of an argumentative dialogue in which two or more parties take part in attacking and defending certain claims through reasoned discourse. This study has set itself to pragmatically analyze and evaluate selected arguments of religious debates. Islamic Christian debates are specifically chosen as data for the current study because they have not received due attention in language studies. This study is essentially concerned with investigating the pragma-rhetorical strategies utilized in the context of Deedat-Swaggart’s debate. To fulfill the aims, it is hypothesized that debaters utilize certain rhetorical pragmatics strategies: figures of speech (metaphor, allusion, irony, rhetorical question, and hyperbole), argumentation appeals (logos, pathos, ethos), and politeness strategies; and highlighting the rules that have to be fulfilled to produce a successful speech act of persuasion. The study employs a mixed method (qualitative and quantitative) to analyze the data and to verify or reject the hypotheses. The results of the study reveal that the most frequent pragmatic strategies utilized by debate are: rhetorical questions, logos, and off record politeness strategies, whereas Swaggart highly employs: metaphor, ethos, and off record politeness strategies. The results have also shown that Deedat’s arguments are stronger and more persuasive than Swaggart’s in terms of satisfying the rules of the successful speech act of persuasion. | ||
| 653 | |a المناظرات الدينية |a العقيدة الإسلامية |a النصارى | ||
| 692 | |b Pragma-Rhetorical |b Rhetoric |b Persuasion |b Argumentation |b Politeness Strategies |b Islamic-Christian Debates | ||
| 700 | |9 650854 |a Ali, Abd Hmood |e Co-Author | ||
| 773 | |4 علم اللغة |6 Linguistics |c 082 |e Journal of Al-Farahidi Arts |f Mağallaẗ ādāb Al-Farāhīdī |l 048 |m مج14, ع48 |o 2228 |s مجلة آداب الفراهيدي |v 014 |x 2074-9554 | ||
| 856 | |u 2228-014-048-082.pdf | ||
| 930 | |d n |p y |q n | ||
| 995 | |a AraBase | ||
| 999 | |c 1217685 |d 1217685 | ||
عناصر مشابهة
-
A Pragmatic Study of the Power of Argumentation in Imam Al-Ridha’s "PBUH" Debate with the Catholicus
بواسطة: حسين، هيام مناضل منشور: (2023) -
Rejection Strategies in American Political Debates: A Pragma- Linguistic Study
بواسطة: المياحي، سمير زامل فرحان منشور: (2023) -
A Pragmatic Analysis of Fallacies in English Religious Argumentative Discourse
بواسطة: محمد، خولة شكر محمود منشور: (2022) -
Developing a Rhetorical Model of Analysis of Allusion by Reference to Presidential American Debates
بواسطة: العزاوى، قاسم عبيس منشور: (2020) -
Reasons of Christians’ Conversion to Islam: An Analytical Deductive Study of the Testimonies of the Ex-Christian Muslims
بواسطة: Abdelfattah, Sami Samir منشور: (2022)
